There really is nothing more I can say here. Because this article caps it and seems to describe the current American socio-political situation so amazingly well.
Do Not Pity the Democrats
Posted on Sep 13, 2010
By Chris Hedges -- Truthdig
There are no longer any major institutions in American society, including the press, the educational system, the financial sector, labor unions, the arts, religious institutions and our dysfunctional political parties, which can be considered democratic. The intent, design and function of these institutions, controlled by corporate money, are to bolster the hierarchical and anti-democratic power of the corporate state. These institutions, often mouthing liberal values, abet and perpetuate mounting inequality. They operate increasingly in secrecy. They ignore suffering or sacrifice human lives for profit. They control and manipulate all levers of power and mass communication. They have muzzled the voices and concerns of citizens. They use entertainment, celebrity gossip and emotionally laden public-relations lies to seduce us into believing in a Disneyworld fantasy of democracy.
The menace we face does not come from the insane wing of the Republican Party, which may make huge inroads in the coming elections, but the institutions tasked with protecting democratic participation. Do not fear Glenn Beck or Sarah Palin. Do not fear the tea party movement, the birthers, the legions of conspiracy theorists or the militias. Fear the underlying corporate power structure, which no one, from Barack Obama to the right-wing nut cases who pollute the airwaves, can alter. If the hegemony of the corporate state is not soon broken we will descend into a technologically enhanced age of barbarism.
Investing emotional and intellectual energy in electoral politics is a waste of time. Resistance means a radical break with the formal structures of American society. We must cut as many ties with consumer society and corporations as possible. We must build a new political and economic consciousness centered on the tangible issues of sustainable agriculture, self-sufficiency and radical environmental reform. The democratic system, and the liberal institutions that once made piecemeal reform possible, is dead. It exists only in name. It is no longer a viable mechanism for change. And the longer we play our scripted and absurd role in this charade the worse it will get. Do not pity Barack Obama and the Democratic Party. They will get what they deserve. They sold the citizens out for cash and power. They lied. They manipulated and deceived the public, from the bailouts to the abandonment of universal health care, to serve corporate interests. They refused to halt the wanton corporate destruction of the ecosystem on which all life depends. They betrayed the most basic ideals of democracy. And they, as much as the Republicans, are the problem.
“It is like being in a pit,” Ralph Nader told me when we spoke on Saturday. “If you are four feet in the pit you have a chance to grab the top and hoist yourself up. If you are 30 feet in the pit you have to start on a different scale.”
All resistance will take place outside the arena of electoral politics. The more we expand community credit unions, community health clinics and food cooperatives and build alternative energy systems, the more empowered we will become.
“To the extent that these organizations expand and get into communities where they do not exist, we will weaken the multinational goliath, from the banks to the agribusinesses to the HMO giants and hospital chains,” Nader said.
The failure of liberals to defend the interests of working men and women as our manufacturing sector was dismantled, labor unions were destroyed and social services were slashed has proved to be a disastrous and fatal misjudgment. Liberals, who betrayed the working class, have no credibility. This is one of the principle reasons the anti-war movement cannot attract the families whose sons and daughters are fighting and dying in Iraq and Afghanistan. And liberal hypocrisy has opened the door for a virulent right wing. If we are to reconnect with the working class we will have to begin from zero. We will have to rebuild the ties with the poor and the working class which the liberal establishment severed. We will have to condemn the liberal class as vociferously as we condemn the right wing. And we will have to remain true to the moral imperative to foster the common good and the tangible needs of housing, health care, jobs, education and food.
We will, once again, be bombarded in this election cycle with messages of fear from the Democratic Party—designed, in the end, to serve corporate interests. “Better Barack Obama than Sarah Palin,” we will be told. Better the sane technocrats like Larry Summers than half-wits like John Bolton. But this time we must resist. If we express the legitimate rage of the dispossessed working class as our own, if we denounce and refuse to cooperate with the Democratic Party, we can begin to impede the march of the right-wing trolls who seem destined to inherit power. If we again prove compliant we will discredit the socialism we should be offering as an alternative to a perverted Christian and corporate fascism.
The tea party movement is, as Nader points out, “a conviction revolt.” Most of the participants in the tea party rallies are not poor. They are small-business people and professionals. They feel that something is wrong. They see that the two parties are equally responsible for the subsidies and bailouts, the wars and the deficits. They know these parties must be replaced. The corporate state, whose interests are being championed by tea party leaders such as Palin and Dick Armey, is working hard to make sure the anger of the movement is directed toward government rather than corporations and Wall Street. And if these corporate apologists succeed, a more overt form of corporate fascism will emerge without a socialist counterweight.
“Poor people do not organize,” Nader lamented. “They never have. It has always been people who have fairly good jobs. You don’t see Wal-Mart workers massing anywhere. The people who are the most militant are the people who had the best blue-collar jobs. Their expectation level was high. When they felt their jobs were being jeopardized they got really angry. But when you are at $7.25 an hour you want to hang on to $7.25 an hour. It is a strange thing.”
“People have institutionalized oppressive power in the form of surrender,” Nader said. “It is not that they like it. But what are you going to do about it? You make the best of it. The system of control is staggeringly dictatorial. It breaks new ground and innovates in ways no one in human history has ever innovated. You start in American history where these corporations have influence. Then they have lobbyists. Then they run candidates. Then they put their appointments in top government positions. Now, they are actually operating the government. Look at Halliburton and Blackwater. Yesterday someone in our office called the Office of Pipeline Safety apropos the San Bruno explosion in California. The press woman answered. The guy in our office saw on the screen that she had CTR next to her name. He said, ‘What is CTR?’ She said, ‘I am a contractor.’ He said, ‘This is the press office at the Department of Transportation. They contracted out the press office?’ ‘Yes,’ she said, ‘but that’s OK, I come to work here every day.’ ”
“The corporate state is the ultimate maturation of American-type fascism,” Nader said. “They leave wide areas of personal freedom so that people can confuse personal freedom with civic freedom—the freedom to go where you want, eat where you want, associate with who you want, buy what you want, work where you want, sleep when you want, play when you want. If people have given up on any civic or political role for themselves there is a sufficient amount of elbow room to get through the day. They do not have the freedom to participate in the decisions about war, foreign policy, domestic health and safety issues, taxes or transportation. That is its genius. But one of its Achilles’ heels is that the price of the corporate state is a deteriorating political economy. They can’t stop their greed from getting the next morsel. The question is, at what point are enough people going to have a breaking point in terms of their own economic plight? At what point will they say enough is enough? When that happens, is a tea party type enough or [Sen. Robert M.] La Follette or Eugene Debs type of enough?”
It is anti-corporate movements as exemplified by the Scandinavian energy firm Kraft&Kultur that we must emulate. Kraft&Kultur sells electricity exclusively from solar and water power. It has begun to merge clean energy with cultural events, bookstores and a political consciousness that actively defies corporate hegemony.
The failure by the Obama administration to use the bailout and stimulus money to build public works such as schools, libraries, roads, clinics, highways, public transit and reclaiming dams, as well as create green jobs, has snuffed out any hope of serious economic, political or environmental reform coming from the centralized bureaucracy of the corporate state. And since the government did not hire enough auditors and examiners to monitor how the hundreds of billions in taxpayer funds funneled to Wall Street are being spent, we will soon see reports of widespread mismanagement and corruption. The rot and corruption at the top levels of our financial and political systems, coupled with the increasing deprivation felt by tens of millions of Americans, are volatile tinder for a horrific right-wing backlash in the absence of a committed socialist alternative.
“If you took a day off and did nothing but listen to Hannity, Beck and Limbaugh and realized that this goes on 260 days a year, you would see that it is overwhelming,” Nader said. “You have to almost have a genetic resistance in your mind and body not to be affected by it. These guys are very good. They are clever. They are funny. They are emotional. It beats me how Air America didn’t make it, except it went after [it criticized] corporations, and corporations advertise. These right-wingers go after government, and government doesn’t advertise. And that is the difference. It isn’t that their message appeals more. Air America starved because it could not get ads.”
We do not have much time left. And the longer we refuse to confront corporate power the more impotent we become as society breaks down. The game of electoral politics, which is given legitimacy by the right and the so-called left on the cable news shows, is just that—a game. It diverts us from what should be our daily task—dismantling, piece by piece, the iron grip that corporations hold over our lives. Hope is a word that is applicable only to those who grasp reality, however bleak, and do something meaningful to fight back—which does not include the farce of elections and involvement in mainstream political parties. Hope is about fighting against the real forces of destruction, not chanting “Yes We Can!” in rallies orchestrated by marketing experts, television crews, pollsters and propagandists or begging Obama to be Obama. Hope, in the hands of realists, spreads fear into the black heart of the corporate elite. But hope, real hope, remains thwarted by our collective self-delusion.
Click here to share this article via email!
Click here to share this article via facebook!
Click here to share this article on Twitter!
Click here to share this article on Reddit!
Click here to share this article on Digg!
Click here to share this article on MySpace!
















25 Comments
gmm777
The article is laden with bullshit and the author is an better than thou asshole.
Annonymous
Annonymous
Annonymous
Annonymous
Annonymous
Annonymous
Annonymous
Annonymous
Annonymous
Annonymous
Annonymous
Annonymous
slowsmile
Maybe it is all bullshit. Trouble is, everything in America is argued politically, Democrat or Republican side, and what this author makes perfectly clear is that politics is owned, steered and controlled by the corporate and financial capitalists. Yeah, sometimes BS hurts. The real BS is the continual political distraction, which always functions as camouflage just to feed the financial greed, but nobody really admits to this. If anyone did agree with this, then they would also see that it really is now completely useless taking a political or electoral democratic stance on all the various issues. All you will get here is more 'Hope and Change' BS instead and who cares whether it comes from Republicans or Democrats -- they are all bought anyway. Meanwhile, the financial capitalist are steadily and quietly able to continue with their own greedy agendas, operating completely unhindered within their own unnoticed and prolonged economic feeding frenzy...
Derryl Hermanutz
"this article caps it and seems to describe the current American socio-political situation so amazingly well."
I agree, slowsmile. Whether you call it a fascist corporatocracy or a plutocracy or some other descriptor, this is the direction America has been heading for a long time now. I think that this grasp toward absolute power is inevitable once a nation's wealth and economic power become concentrated beyond a critical limit. When robber barons get rich enough to buy lawmakers and judges and put themselves above the law and actually get away with this outrage, that's the beginning. When robber barons become the lawmakers, as in the revolving door between Goldman Sachs and the US administration, that's getting toward the end of the process via which democracy devolves into tyranny of one form or another.
Chris Hedges is right. "Democracy" has become a sham, a deceived and deluded public arguing over trivia while real power helps itself to the nation's cream and gravy (and now to the meat and potatoes too) behind the noisy distracting public stage. But democracy's demise is self-inflicted. I think universal suffrage was the beginning of the end. In the original republic only white male landowners got the vote. Today we probably disagree with the "white male" exclusivity, but there's good reason to limit voting to only those who have some skin in the game.
Would you take stock market advice from someone who had never managed to save enough money to actually buy some stocks? Would you take advice from someone who had lost all his money in the market? Or would you take advice from someone who had made himself a comfortable little fortune by saving money that he worked for, getting to know the market, and investing intelligently? That is, would you take advice from losers or from winners?
The same goes for voting. In the original Republic only "winners" got to vote. Losers may 'think' they know what is in their interest, but the fact they lost all their money by following their own advice suggests they don't understand what they're doing. To become a landowner and to remain a landowner requires some ongoing understanding of what your interests are and how your country actually works. This limits voting to people who possess enough knowledge to understand the consequences of the political choices facing them and to argue and vote accordingly. Our interests compete with and/or overlap and/or complement one another and the majority's interests get elected. On balance the interests of "the nation" are served, even though there are always winners and losers with every public 'corporate' policy that we all must abide by. This is about as good a way of setting up a government as I can imagine.
Once you let everybody with a pulse vote you open the door to the kind of gladhanding pandering tax and spend politician who starts systematically dismantling the nation that smart ambitious hard working men built. The "losers" elect themselves a welfare state, in which they become the "winners". Until, as Churchill put it, the state runs out of other people's money to spend.
Jason Rines
@derryl: Nicely put Derryl. I like the idea of voters having skin in the game and of the main reasons political systems get corrupted, sound money or the lack of it as we discuss often is the 1st influencer. That leads to the 2nd problem of buying votes.
Annonymous
The worm is turning, we are heading slowly but surely back to the indiviual.
If you have a grandmother or mother in a medicare nursing home, I am sending you this message:
Be prepared to bring her home in the next 18 months, because the party is over. The lights are about to go out on goverment spending.
The FED can't help you and it can't bail Uncle Sam out. The market will not allow it.
Jason Rines
@Anonymous: You are correct. However, I give it until 2015 before expecting to take Mom in. Why? Because benefits are being phased out now and government is also now doing what they were supposed to be doing on due diligence on whether aid can be approved based on income, assets, etc. Favoritism still applies to particular groups and I paint a broad brush with me response but it is happening. Citizens are paying the price in increased premiums on Obamacare ALREADY and this taxation flows through to government just like oil does. The Treasury bubble will last another couple of years before China's implicit guarantee of the reserve currency peg become explicit in 2013. SDR's were set up last year.
These things I mentioned will stretch the Health entitlement process out a bit further than your forecast but I did like how you mentioned taking the family in. Life saving meds will still be available, but not facilites to house all the treatment demand.
The Fed can't save anybody and the Fed has violated it's independence long ago. It is the 4th rail of government already and it will continue to devalue the currency. The response from the pharmaceutical industry, doctors and other health care providers will accept less and less devalued currency (by producing less, I know I am being simplistic in this response) accelerating the rationing effect.
Jason Rines
To anon above and for the wider audience:
You are correct. However, I give it until 2015 before expecting to take Mom in. Why? Because benefits are being phased out now and government is also now doing what they were supposed to be doing on due diligence on whether aid can be approved based on income, assets, etc. Favoritism still applies to particular groups and I paint a broad brush with me response but it is happening. Citizens are paying the price in increased premiums on Obamacare ALREADY and this taxation flows through to government just like oil does. The Treasury bubble will last another couple of years before China's implicit guarantee of the reserve currency peg become explicit in 2013. SDR's were set up last year.
These things I mentioned will stretch the Health entitlement process out a bit further than your forecast but I did like how you mentioned taking the family in. Life saving meds will still be available, but not facilites to house all the treatment demand.
The Fed can't save anybody and the Fed has violated it's independence long ago. It is the 4th rail of government already and it will continue to devalue the currency. The response from the pharmaceutical industry, doctors and other health care providers will accept less and less devalued currency by producing less.
Thomas LaCour
@JasonRines:
"Citizens are paying the price in increased premiums on Obamacare ALREADY and this taxation flows through to government just like oil does."
If citizens were responsible Patriots, they would balk, and refuse to comply with Obamacare. Thus was it done with the Whiskey Tax of 1791. Non-compliance was rife, widespread.
I am one. I am the ONLY one I know who refuses to comply with the tyrannical and unconstitutional Obamacare law. I cancelled my health insurance (years ago) and will not buy more. I am, by definition, now a criminal.
Are there such patriots today, even a few, while there were so very many in 1791-1805? Are there any businesses, large or small, who dare to take such a stand?
Talk is cheap.
StuckInNJ
Chris Coons (D - Delaware) in his own words called himself a "bearded Marxist".
Amazingly, his transformation from a conservative to Marxist took place while he spent time in Kenya. This is true. Look it up. Anyway, this is one helluva coincidence.
So, I sits and thinks .... sits and thinks ...... sits and thinks ..... EUREKA! .... I just thunk of a new game. I am going to submit it to Parker Bros. But, first I want to give it a test drive here.
It's called: Can You Spot the Marxist Coon?
Cool game, huh?
Jenn Johnson
@StuckInNJ: Interesting how those who find capitalism reprehensible bc it pits man against man fail to see that Marxisms underlying philosophy is the same but adds jealousy to the mix. If man is not jealous of man, there is no need for govt redistribution and thus no need for goverment. Hmmmm.
Thomas LaCour
"Citizens are paying the price in increased premiums on Obamacare ALREADY and this taxation flows through to government just like oil does."
If citizens were responsible Patriots, they would balk, and refuse to comply with Obamacare. Thus was it done with the Whiskey Tax of 1791. Non-compliance was rife, widespread, and vigorous (they tarred and feathered and ran out on a rail one Whisky Tax Collector). And, in the end, the Tax was rendered null and void in 1803, at least for a while.
I am one. I am the ONLY one I know who refuses to comply with the tyrannical and unconstitutional Obamacare law. I cancelled my health insurance (years ago, in fact; "insurance" is a massive scam) and would not buy more due to a sensible cost/benefit basis anyway, but now, especially, I will not because Fedzilla dares to command it and pretend to the authority to do so. I am now, by Fedzilla definition, a criminal, like those who refused to comply with the Whisky Tax that Hamilton, Washington and Congress thought so good. Come and get me, Nancy.
Are there such patriots today, even a few, while there were so very many in 1791-1805? Are there any businesses, large or small, who dare to take such a stand?
Talk is cheap.
Annonymous
No, there are at least two, you and me TL. I cancelled my "health insurance" (read: discount plan) last year and have already saved $1400 in "not paid premiums minus actual health care expenses."
We pay cash for doctor, dental and vision expenses, and pay far far less than we did when we paid health "insurance" premiums plus deductibles and co-pays.
I too am a criminal in the eyes of Fedzilla, with not a speck of health "insurance" for me or the rest of the family.
Come get me too, Nancy. Then pay for my health care while you have me locked up, bitch.
mpadi2
@DavyC: Amen, sir.